Thursday, November 23, 2017

HINDU HOLOCAUST CONTINUES - CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL



ONE BABRI MASJID DEMOLITION AT AYODHYA , THE MECCA KAABA SPOT EQUIVALENT  OF HINDUS,  AND THE WHOLE WORLD CONDEMNS HINDUS


WHAT ABOUT THOUSANDS OF TEMPLES DESTROYED IN KASHMIR, PAKISTAN AND BANGLADESH ?    WHAT ABOUT ETHNIC CLEANSING OF HINDUS ?


http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2012/11/babri-masjid-demolition-mughal-emperor.html



WHY DO JEWS CRY ABOUT SIX MILLIONS JEWS DEAD ?  


HITLER WAS A JEW.


MAXIMUM JEWS WERE KILLED BY JEWS THEMSELVES AS THEY DID NOT WANT ANAL SEX RECEIVING PANSY HOMOSEXUAL SCUM IN THE PROMISED LAND





THIS PLANET SHALL WAKE UP TO THE HINDU HOLOCAUST .   

THE DESH DROHI ROTHSCHILDs COMMIE BENAMI INDIAN MEDIA WILL NOT REPORT IT NOR WILL COMMIE HISTORIANS LIKE ROMILA THAPAR , IRFAN HABIB TYPES




THE FIRST INQUISITION HAPPENED IN GOA WHERE CRYPTO JEW JESUIT FRANCIS XAVIER EXTERMINATED MORE THAN 20,000 HINDUS WITH SMALL POX BLANKETS AND THEN FLED TO CHINA




DELIBERATE FAMINE WAS CREATED IN INDIA BY THE WHITE INVADER SO THAT DESPERATE INDIANS COULD BE RELOCATED ABROAD ( WITH FULL FAMILY ) TO WORK AS SLAVES IN ROTHSCHILDs PLANTATIONS




AMARTYA SEN WAS GIVEN NOBEL PURASKAR AND A JEWESS ROTHSCHILD WIFE , AS HE WHITE WASHED DELIBERATE FAMINE BY THE WHITE INVADER IN INDIA




95% OF PRICELESS AYURVEDIC HERBS ARE NOW LOST DUE TO CAPTURE OF TEMPLE LANDS AND DESTRUCTION OF SNAKE GROVES BY COMMIES AND CHRISTIANS




HINDU HATING CHRISTIAN EVANGELIST KP YOHANNAN ( FOREIGN CONTROLLED ) WENT AND DONATED ONE CRORE TO ROTHSCHILDs APCO BRANDED MODI --AND HE TOOK IT




FALSE STORIES ABOUT SAVAGE HINDUS ARE COOKED UP DAILY BY DESH DROHIS IN FOREIGN PAYROLL , TO MAKE THE HINDU SELF LOATHING











HINDUS ARE BRANDED SUPERSTITIOUS , WHEN THERE IS NIL SUPERTITION IN HINDUISM


THE MOST ANCIENT UNIVERSITY  ON THIS PLANET IS KODUNGALLUR UNIVERSITY.  


THE TEMPLE ATTACHED TO IT IS ATTACKED EVERY YEAR -- MENSES BLOOD , SEMEN , HUMAN URINE AND SHIT IS THROWN INTO THE SANCTUM SANCTORUM.  


IT HAPPENED LAST YEAR TOO DESPITE THIS BLOGSITE MAKING REPRESENTATION TO PM MODI MORE THAN 50 TIMES




HINDUS ARE NOT WILLING TO TAKE SHIT ANYMORE.


ROTHSCHILDs APCO BRANDED MODIs TERM IS GETTING OVER,  YET HE HAS DONE NOTHING FOR KASHMIRI PANDITS OR HINDUS WHOSE HONOUR HAS BEEN STRIPPED .

INDIA HAS NOT PRODUCED A WEIRD LEADER LIKE MODI TILL TODAY --  WHO IS SO BHOOKA FOR WHITE JEWs APPROVAL


#####################################################


BELOW FIND SENTIMENTS EXPRESSED BY A WHITE FOREIGNER 

A bit long message..but please read... an eye opener...

There is an IAS officer as head of every temple. Not for any of the Masjids or  churches.


Foreign writer opens our eyes

The Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Act of 1951 allows State Governments and politicians to take over thousands of Hindu Temples and maintain complete control over them and their properties. It is claimed that they can sell the temple assets and properties and use the money in any way they choose.

A charge has been made not by any Temple authority, but by a foreign writer, Stephen Knapp in a book (Crimes Against India and the Need to Protect Ancient Vedic Tradition)published in the United States that makes shocking reading.


Hundreds of temples in centuries past have been built in India by devout rulers and the donations given to them by devotees have been used for the benefit of the (other) people. If, presently, money collected has ever been misused (and that word needs to be defined), it is for the devotees to protest and not for any government to interfere. This is what has been happening currently under an intrusive law.

(There is a popular belief that since the temples are controlled by the government now, the funds can be used for any social purpose at least. Please note that none of the devout kings who constructed these temples claimed any right over the temples. Many of them have not even left their names behind. Let alone not controlling the temples and their funds, these kings , in fact, consigned lands and other properties, including their jewels, to these temples.  They only facilitated and did not claim any rights over these temples. That is the only acceptable attitude. 

None of the big temples (barring perhaps a handful) have been constructed by the governments of today and they have no right over any of these temples – funds, administration or over the way in which the worship is to be conducted. The funds of these temples should be used only for the administration of these temples, their repairs, the emoluments, the infrastructure and facilities around these temples and the surplus for the upkeep of other less known temples especially the old ones. ) ?

It would seem, for instance, that under a Temple Empowerment Act, about43,000 temples in Andhra Pradesh have come under Government control and only 18 per cent of the revenue of these temples have been returned for temple purposes, theremaining 82 per cent being used for purposes unstated.

Apparently even the world famous Tirumala Tirupati Temple has not been spared. According to Knapp, the temple collects over Rs 3,100 crores every year and the State Government has not denied the charge that as much as 85 per cent of this is transferred to the State Exchequer, much of which goes to causes that are not connected with the Hindu community. 

Another charge that has been made is that the Andhra Government has also allowed the demolition of at least ten temples for the construction of a golf course. Imagine the outcry writes Knapp, if ten mosques had been demolished.

It would seem that inKaranataka, Rs. 79 crores were collected from about two lakh temples and from that, temples received Rs seven crores for their maintenance, Muslim madrassahs and Haj subsidy were given Rs 59 crore and churches about Rs 13 crore.

Because of this, Knapp writes, 25 per cent of the two lakh temples or about 50,000 temples in Karnataka will be closed down for lack of resources, and he adds: The only way the government can continue to do this is with the indifference and tolerance of the Hindus.

Knapp then refers to Kerala where, he says, funds from the Guruvayur Temple are diverted to other government projects denying improvement to 45 Hindu temples. Land belonging to the Ayyappa Temple, apparently has been grabbed and Church encroaches are occupying huge areas of forest land, running into thousands of acres, near Sabarimala.

A charge is made that the Communist state government of Kerala. wants to pass an Ordinance to disband the Travancore & Cochin Autonomous Devaswom Boards (TCDBs) and take over their limited independent authority of 1,800 Hindu temples. If what the author says is true, even the Maharashtra Government wants to take over some 450,000 temples in the state which would supply a huge amount of revenue to correct the states bankrupt conditions

And to top it all, Knapp says that in Orissa, the state government intends to sell over 70,000 acres of endowment lands from the Jagannath Temple, the proceeds of which would solve a huge financial crunch brought about by its own mismanagement of temple assets.

Says Knapp: Why such occurrences are so often not known is that the Indian media, especially the Englishtelevision and press, are often anti-Hindu in their approach, and thus not inclined to give much coverage, and certainly no sympathy, for anything that may affect the Hindu community. Therefore, such government action that play against the Hindu community go on without much or any attention attracted to them.

Knapp obviously is on record. If the facts produced by him are incorrect, it is up to the government to say so. It is quite possible that some individuals might have set up temples to deal with lucrative earnings. But that, surely, is none of the governments business? Instead of taking over all earnings, the government surely can appoint committees to make the temples accountable especially for the funds – received and earned-  so that the amount discovered is fairly used for temple purposes only.

Says Knapp: Nowhere in the free, democratic world are the religious institutions managed, maligned and controlled by the government, thus denying the religious freedom of the people of the country. 

But it is happening in India. Government officials have taken control of Hindu temples because they smell money in them, they recognise the indifference of Hindus, they are aware of the unlimited patience and tolerance of Hindus, they also know that it is not in the blood of Hindus to go to the streets to demonstrate, destroy property, threaten, loot, harm and kill (generally or Normally )

Many Hindus are sitting and watching the demise of their culture. They need to express their views loud and clear Knapp obviously does not know that should they do so, they would be damned as communalists. But it is time some one asked the Government to lay down all the facts on the table so that the public would know what is happening behind its back. Robbing Peter to pay Paul is not secularism. And temples are not for looting, under any name. One thought that Mohammad of Ghazni had long been dead.


###########################

MONEY IN TEMPLE BHANDARS ARE PUT BY VERY POOR HINDUS.  

OUR YOUNG MAID WENT AND PUT HER GOLD CHAIN INSIDE A TEMPLE BHANDAR -  I REMEMBER THIS INCIDENT WHICH HAPPENED 55 YEARS AGO..   SHE HAD NO REGRETS 

THE KSHATRIYA BLOOD OF HINDUS HAS EVAPORATED ?

IT DOES NOT BOIL WHEN DROHIS HAVE MADE SITA AND RAVAN HAVE SEX ?


.



WHEN BASTARD ISLAMIC PAINTER MF HUSSAIN SHOWED SITA HAPPILY PREENING HER HAIR SITTING NAKED ON RAVANAs LAP AFTER ILLICIT SEX,    THE COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY CRIED    “ VERY GOOD.   GREAT ARTISTIC FREEDOM”

WE KNOW THESE BASTARD DROHI JUDGES  ..  THEY HAVE RETIRED...

HINDUS HAVE WOKEN UP

RAJPUTS WILL DEFEND THEIR HONOUR

JUST WHO THE HELL IS THE FELLOW SANJAY LEELA BHANSALI—   A MAN WITHOUT WIFE AND CHILDREN AT THE AGE OF 55  ? . 

HIS SERVANTS HAVE BLOWN THE WHISTLE.     WE KNOW WHO HE IS.   

WE KNOW THE SEXUAL PREFERENCES OF MF HUSSAIN TOO.


Below:  DROHI woman ( who looks like a man in a sari ) immediately called MF Hussain an ANGEL --  this KALANK celebrates when Bharatmata bleeds and is one of the most hated women in India.



https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/books/writeindia/season2.cms

SHOBHAA DE IS THE MOST USELESS WRITER IN INDIA..

THIS WOMAN WHO LOOKS LIKE A MAN IN A SARI , SHE HAS WRITTEN 19 PATHETIC SEMI PORN NOVELS ALL STARTING WITH ALPHABET "S"

NOBODY READS THEM

capt ajit vadakayil
..





http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2017/11/hindu-holocaust-continues-capt-ajit.html

SPREAD ABOVE LINK LIKE WILD FIRE ON SOCIAL MEDIA

PUT ABOVE LINK IN THE WEBSITES OF EVERY DESH BHAKT HINDU

ALSO PUT IN WEBSITES OF---

PMO,

PM MODI

LAW MINISTER

CJI

SUPREME COURT BAR COUNCIL

EDUCATION MINISTER

I&B MINISTER

HOME MINISTER

DEFENCE MINISTER

FINANCE MINISTER

YOGI ADITYANATH

SUSHMA SWARAJ

STEPHEN KNAPP

SWAMY

SHOBHAA DE

GURUMURTHY

Capt...I have sent above link with this comment of yours.....saala gaand mein dum chahiye aisa likhne ke liye...
Unlike the most of us Capt Saab, who are only going to be forgotten someday. People will remember you for your great contribution..always greatful..

Reply

Replies



Capt. Ajit VadakayilApril 12, 2017 at 5:19 PM

MY SANATANA DHARMA SERIES WILL REMAIN TILL THE SUN GOES SUPERVOVA

THIS IS ADVAITA VEDANTA AS PER WIKI

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advaita_Vedanta

THIS IS ADVAITA VEDANTA AS PER VADAKAYIL

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2013/01/advaita-vedanta-philosophy-adi.html

THIS IS DVAITA VEDANTA AS PER WIKIPEDIA

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dvaita_Vedanta

THIS IS DVAITA VEDANTA AS PER VADAKAYIL

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2013/05/dvaita-vedanta-of-sanatana-dharma-or.html

THIS IS SANKYA VEDANTA AS PER WIKIPEDIA

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samkhya

THIS IS SAMKHYA VEDNTA AS PER VADAKAYIL ( read the third template of PURUSHA and PRAGATI )

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2015/09/sanatana-dharma-hinduism-exhumed-and.html

THIS IS ASHWAMEDHA YAGNA AS PER WIKIPEDIA

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashvamedha

THIS IS ASHWAMEDHA YAGNA AS PER VADAKAYIL

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2014/09/ashwamedha-yagam-bloodless-sacrifice.html

THIS IS KAMASUTRA AS PER WIKIPEDIA ( THE BASTARDS HAVE REVISED IT AND REMOVED THE EMPHASIS ON VULGAR SEXUAL INTERCOURSE POSITIONS )

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kama_Sutra

THIS IS KAMASUTRA AS PER VADAKAYIL

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2014/07/kamasutra-by-vatsayana-immoral-sexual.html

WHO DO YOU THINK WILL LAST ?

WIKIPEDIA OR VADAKAYIL ?

capt ajit vadakayil




  1. SANATANA DHARMA HAS BEEN DESTROYED FROM WITHIN

    NOT ANY MORE


    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..




CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
..



Monday, November 20, 2017

BLOCKCHAIN, PROOF OF ELAPSED TIME, INTEL SAWTOOTH PLATFORM , TEE, SGX , PART 14 - CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL


THIS POST IS CONTINUED FROM PART 13, BELOW---




Let us hear what INTEL tells about their own achievements in their whitepaper ( extracts )  …

Info about block chain I have already covered and hence is a mere repeat.

Intel has developed the Sawtooth Lake Distributed Ledger Platform (SLDLP), that is targeted at building, deploying, and running distributed ledgers.

A distributed ledger can be thought of as a secure database that is implemented among a group of participants without a central authority or administration. 

Participants in the ledger can submit transactions to add, remove or modify records in the database according to a set of rules that are guaranteed to be enforced by the ledger (for example, the ledger may ensure that you can’t spend money that you don’t have).

A blockchain is an immutable series of transactions that is shared by all participants in the ledger. Cryptographic signatures ensure correctness and guarantee “non-repudiation” (that is, that once a transaction is committed to the blockchain, it cannot be un-committed). 

Distributed consensus algorithms ensure that all participants see the same series of transactions even if bad actors try to compromise the system. The most unique characteristic of a blockchain is that it can provide these capabilities without a central organization to provide authorization or administration. 

The blockchain method got its name from the way it builds historical transactions: records of transactions are collected in blocks that are time/date stamped and chained together in chronological order. 

A new transaction is appended with a timestamp as a new block to the back of the current blockchain. Each valid block in a blockchain contains a reference to the previous valid block, and this creates a chain of blocks that captures the history of a transaction. 

Blockchain is a machine for creating trust: the blockchain allows a group of users who have no particular confidence in each other to collaborate without having to go through a neutral central authority.

Distributed ledgers based on blockchain technology present several advantages over current record handling methods that rely on a centralized database: 1) Central intermediaries are removed from the transaction, 2) Connections between counterparts are simplified because the data resides at every participant, and 3) Data is recorded on a tamper-proof and secure block chain. 

Participants in a blockchain event each have their own copy of the stored data in what can be considered a secure, distributed, shared database. Changes to the data are validated by participants collectively, and updated across the network almost immediately.

There are three common types of distributed ledger in use: public (or open) ledgers, private (or permissioned) ledgers, and consortium ledgers. The main distinction among the types is who has access to the database.

Advantages of blockchain and distributed ledger technology are:--
• Convergence on a consensus for changes applied to the data
• Decentralized data and authority
• Non-repudiation of data (digitally signed information)
• Full replication of data (distribution of encrypted storage)
• Distribution of trust (fully auditable)

Disadvantages of blockchain and distributed ledger technology are:--
• Inefficient method for data transfer
• No service level agreement (needed for Enterprise applications)
• Many unanswered questions: validation, scalability, transaction complexity, number of participants, viability of privacy

The Intel Sawtooth Lake Distributed Ledger Platform (SLDLP) is a modular prototyping platform that is targeted at building, deploying, and running distributed ledgers. The Intel SLDLP consists of an SGXenabled SDK platform, an SGX distributed ledger toolkit (white boxes), and the distributed ledger
technology

The SGX technology (integrated into Skylake) provides an add-on SGX DLT Toolkit  to facilitate and streamline operations in eight areas of the distributed ledger environment.

• Secure Wallets: Secure management for credentials used to interact with the ledger
• Secure I/O: Secure path for information to ensure the integrity of information triggering smart contracts (technology that is in development)
• PoET: An algorithm that uses Intel’s Software Guard Extensions (SGX) to establish a globally consistent view of the ledger
• Sawtooth Lake: Intel’s platform for building distributed ledgers
• Secure Containers: Secure execution containers (technology that is in development)
• 3D XPoint™ Memory: Intel’s large scale persistent memory
• SGX: Intel’s Software Guard Extensions, an enclave that protects code and data from exposure and modification
• Crypto Accelerators: AES-NI and other accelerators that improve the performance of cryptographic algorithms

The SLDLP uses a Nakamoto-style consensus algorithm called Proof of Elapsed Time (PoET). 

As a proof algorithm, PoET uses a lottery for leader election that is based on a guaranteed wait-time provided through a trusted execution environment. 

For the purpose of achieving distributed consensus efficiently, this lottery function provides several characteristics:--
• Fairness: The function should distribute leader election across the broadest possible population of participants.
• Investment: The cost of controlling the leader election process should be proportional to the value gained from it.
• Verification: It should be relatively simple for all participants to verify that the leader was legitimately selected.
Blockchain provides mechanisms to:--
• Ensure that the contents of the records have not been changed ( as hash generated would be unique to the document contents)
• Provide an audit trail by adding timestamp to the records
• Restrict access to authorized users
• Enable attribution that encourages individual participation in large-scale projects



CK
November 20, 2017 at 4:22 PM

SBI blockchain rollout December

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/indias-largest-bank-confirms-blockchain-rollout-december/

INDIA IS BEING USED AS A GUINEA PIG IN FINANCE

WE KNOW HOW BHARATMATA PAID THE PRICE FOR THE KOSHER" GREEN REVOLUTION " , THE KOSHER "WHITE REVOLUTION " AND KOSHER  " EVIL PHARMA INDIANS AS GUINEA PIGS REVOLUTION "

WHAT THE FUCK IS HAPPENING ? 


Capt. Ajit Vadakayil

November 20, 2017 at 5:26 PM

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/indias-largest-bank-confirms-blockchain-rollout-december/

This is TOTALLY reliant on Intel’s Software Guard Extensions(SGX) .

SO STATE BANK OF INDIA ( READ AS FINANCE MINISTRY RUN BY A LAWYER NAMED ARUN JAITLEY ) WANTS TO OPEN INDIAs BOTTOMS WIDE TO INTEL , RIGHT ?

PoET doesn't make sense for either private or public blockchains. ..

It's way too easy to create multiple layers of obfuscation that ultimately don't contribute to the underlying security model...

WE THE PEOPLE ASK ASK -- WHAT IS THE VESTED AGENDA ?

WHO IS CONDUCTING THIS CONTROLLED "SWAYAMVAR " SHADI BETWEEN BHARATMATA AND KOSHER INTEL ?

WE ASK—

ARE WE DIVING OFF THE DEEP END ?

IS THIS SYSTEM TRIED AND TESTED?   WHERE IS THE PROOF?

IS THIS WHY MODI AND JAITLEY HAVE MERGED ALL INDIAN BANKS TO HOCK OUR NATIONs FINANCES AND FUTURE TO INTEL ?

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2017/11/blockchain-bitcoins-ponzi-part-13-capt.html

WE WATCH--SOME PEOPLE WILL SOON GO TO JAIL FOR OFFENCES A MILLION TIMES WORSE WORSE THAN THE ENRON SCAM.

PUT THIS CRITICAL COMMENT IN THE WEBSITE OF ARUN JAITLEY, SBI CHAIRMAN , FINANCE MINISTRY, PMO, PM MODI, CJI, LAW MINISTER, HOME MINISTER, SWAMY , GURUMURTHY

capt ajit vadakayil
..




SBI is constrained to use Intel hardware like SGX to execute code in a protected area that can't be inspected or tampered with.

Intel came up with a consensus algorithm which may find its way to cryptocurrency at some point in the future. This concept is known as Proof of Elapsed Time 

Intel is exploring this distributed consensus model as part of their Sawtooth project.

Hyperledger Sawtooth is an enterprise distributed ledger (aka blockchain) project. 

In Sawtooth, the data model and transaction language are implemented in a transaction family.

Consensus is the process of building agreement among a group of mutually distrusting participants. There are many different algorithms for building consensus based on requirements related to performance, scalability, consistency, threat model, and failure model.

Consensus is the validation mechanism that a blockchain network uses . These are the validation rules by which the network automatically validates a transaction . Consensus is required to maintain the world state of the blockchain network.

While deciding which Blockchain platform to choose it is important to understand the consensus mechanism that it deploys because the underlying philosophy and risk to business depends a lot on the chosen consensus mechanism.

The Proof of Elapsed Time consensus protocol is what is used by Intel Sawtooth now IntelLedger (under Linux Hyperledger Foundation) .

This consensus algorithm has vouched for a random leader election methodology. The leader can be any of the participating active nodes. The chosen leader finalizes the block .

The system  ensures that the leader is chosen without manipulation and all participating notes verify the same and also deploy random leader distribution method. 

Intel SGX is a set of CPU code instructions from Intel that allows user-level code to allocate private regions of memory, called enclaves, that are protected from processes running at higher privilege levels.

Intel designed SGX to be useful for implementing secure remote computation, secure browsing, and digital rights management (DRM). 

PoET uses Intel special processor capability to regulate block frequency rather than computation

Sawtooth abstracts the core concepts of consensus and isolates consensus from transaction semantics.  The interface supports plugging in various consensus implementations. Sawtooth provides two such implementations: dev_mode and PoET.

Dev_mode is a simplified random leader algorithm that is useful for developers and test networks that require only crash fault tolerance.

PoET, short for “Proof of Elapsed Time” is a Nakamoto-style consensus algorithm. It is designed to be a production-grade protocol capable of supporting large network populations.

PoET essentially works as follows... Every validator requests a wait time from an enclave(a trusted function). The validator with the shortest wait time for a particular transaction block is elected the leader.

Proof-of-elapsed-time (PoET), solves the computing problem of "random leader election," or selecting who will create the next block of transactions.

One function, say “CreateTimer” creates a timer for a transaction block that is guaranteed to have been created by the enclave. 

Another function, say “CheckTimer” verifies that the timer was created by the enclave and, if it has expired, creates an attestation that can be used to verify that validator did, in fact, wait the allotted time before claiming the leadership role.

The PoET leader election algorithm meets the criteria for a good lottery algorithm. It randomly distributes leadership election across the entire population of validators with distribution that is similar to what is provided by other lottery algorithms.

The probability of election is proportional to the resources contributed (in this case, resources are general purpose processors with a trusted execution environment). 

An attestation of execution provides information for verifying that the certificate was created within the enclave (and that the validator waited the allotted time).

Further, the low cost of participation increases the likelihood that the population of validators will be large, increasing the robustness of the consensus algorithm.

The Sawtooth platform is distributed in source code form with an Apache license.

The Apache License is a permissive free software license written by the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) .

Like other free software licenses, the license allows the user of the software the freedom to use the software for any purpose, to distribute it, to modify it, and to distribute modified versions of the software, under the terms of the license, without concern for royalties.

The Apache License allows you to freely use, modify, and distribute any Apache licensed product.

PoET is notably designed to be used on a certain type of computer manufactured by Intel, called trusted execution environments (TEE).

The Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) is a secure area of the main processor. It guarantees code and data loaded inside to be protected with respect to confidentiality and integrity.

The TEE as an isolated execution environment provides security features such as isolated execution, integrity of Trusted Applications along with confidentiality of their assets.  

In general terms, the TEE offers an execution space that provides a higher level of security than a rich mobile operating system open (mobile OS) and more functionality than a 'secure element' (SE).

The “Sawtooth Lake” platform, which promises to allow companies to run their own blockchain, providing a permanent digital record. 

The Sawtooth Lake platform provides two consensus protocols with different performance trade-offs. The first, called PoET for “Proof of Elapsed Time,” is a lottery protocol that builds on Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) provided by Intel’s Software Guard Extensions (SGX) to address the needs of large populations of participants.

The second, Quorum Voting, is an adaptation of the Ripple and Stellar consensus protocols and serves to address the needs of applications that require immediate transaction finality.

PoET uses a TEE such as SGX to ensure a safe, random and robust lottery function without the specialized hardware and high power required by most proof algorithms.

Intel’s approach is based on a guaranteed wait time provided through the TEE. According to Intel, the algorithm scales to thousands of participants and will run efficiently on any Intel processor that supports SGX. 

Algorithms for achieving consensus with arbitrary faults generally require some form of voting among a known set of participants. Two general approaches have been proposed.

The first, often referred to as “Nakamoto consensus”, elects a leader through some form of “lottery”. The leader then proposes a block that can be added to a chain of previously committed blocks. In Bitcoin, the first participant to successfully solve a cryptographic puzzle wins the leader-election lottery.

The elected leader broadcasts the new block to the rest of the participants who implicitly vote to accept the block by adding the block to a chain of accepted blocks and proposing subsequent transaction blocks that build on that chain.

The second approach is based on traditional Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT) algorithms and uses multiple rounds of explicit votes to achieve consensus. Ripple and Stellar developed consensus protocols that extend traditional BFT for open participation.

Sawtooth Lake abstracts the core concepts of consensus, isolates consensus from transaction semantics, and provides two consensus protocols with different performance trade-offs.

The first, called PoET for “Proof of Elapsed Time”, is a lottery protocol that builds on trusted execution environments (TEEs) provided by Intel’s SGX to address the needs of large populations of participants.

The second, Quorum Voting, is an adaptation of the Ripple and Stellar consensus protocols and serves to address the needs of applications that require immediate transaction finality.

The idea of Proof of Elapsed Time  acts much like Bitcoin's Proof of Work lottery consensus, but does not require nearly as much electricity expenditure.

Participants can either enter low power mode whilst TEE is generating PoET and save on costs, or perform other functions if part of a cloud compute environment.

One potential consequence of PoET versus Bitcoin's PoW is a shift from OPEX to CAPEX as an economic deterrent to Sybil and 51% attacks on a blockchain network.

Bitcoin's miners are primarily using dedicated ASIC chips to solve the cryptographic puzzle, which are much faster and cheaper than running CPUs to perform the same task, but they burn through a lot of electricity.

This means you can reduce your initial CAPEX outlay by using cheaper ASICs, but have high OPEX electricity costs. With PoET, you have to purchase more expensive CPUs but reduce electricity OPEX costs.

Capital expenditure, or CapEx, are funds used by a company to acquire, upgrade, and maintain physical assets such as property, industrial buildings, or equipment. CapEx is often used to undertake new projects or investments by the firm.

An operating expense ( OPEX ) results from the ongoing costs a company pays to run its basic business.

Intel is the creator of the open source Hyperledger Sawtooth project, which enables blockchain usages for enterprise and other segments and is designed to run on the Intel Xeon platform.

While SGX technology is proprietary, the blockchain software that grew out of Intel’s  experiments is not, and has since been open-sourced as the Hyperledger Sawtooth code base.

SOMEBODY ASKED ME 

WHAT IS A BANANA REPUBLIC? IS INDIA A BANANA REPUBLIC?

BANANA REPUBLIC IS A DERISIVE TERM GIVEN TO A NATION WHICH IS RULED BY WHITE JEWS FROM ABROAD USING THEIR PUPPET LEADERS.

INDIA IS A BANANA REPUBLIC--EVEN 70 YEARS AFTER INDEPENDENCE

EXAMPLE ?

I WILL GIVE JUST TWO AMONG THOUSANDS

AAA) BASAVA WAS A GOD CREATED AND BACKDATED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD 

BEFORE THE WHITE INVADER CAME TO INDIA, NOBODY IN INDIA HEARD OF BASAVA.

VEERASHAIVA LINGAYATHS BURY THEIR DEAD TODAY. IF YOU GO TO THEIR BURIAL YARDS YOU CAN SEE SHIVALINGAM / NANDI / SHIVA STATUE -- WHICH IS NOT ALLOWED.

NOW THEIR FOREIGN FUNDED NGOs HAVE DRIVEN SUCH HARTED TO SANATANA DHARMA THAT THE POLIICIANS WANT TO SPLIT FROM HINDUISM.

THEY HAVE GIVEN PROPAGANDA AND PROPPED UP A FELLOW NAMED VEMANA . 

TODAY WE HAVE STAMPS OF VEMANA AND UNIVERSITIES . IN THE TEXT BOOKS OF SCHOOL CHILDREN THEY HAVE INCUDED "VEDAS OF VEMANA"

WANNA READ IT?
I ASK MY READERS --YOU MUST READ IT--   ONLY THEN YOU WILL KNOW THE MEANING OF BANANA REPUBLIC--   WHERE WERE ARE NO BETTER THAN MONKEYS HOLDING A BANANA.

SCROLL DOWN THIS POST --AND READ THE YELLOW RIBBON HIGHLIGHTED PARTS UNDER THE VEMANA STAMP.

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2015/09/sanatana-dharma-hinduism-exhumed-and_30.html

WHAT IS ALL THIS ?

IS THIS FIT TO BE TAUGHT IN SCHOOL ?

ARE WE MAD ?

TELUGUS WENT ABROAD AS INDENTURED LABOUR ONLY BECAUSE OF A WHITE SKINNED BRITISH COLLECTOR NAMED CP BROWN-- WHO IS CONSIDERED AS A GOD IN TELUGU LAND . CP BROWN CREATED BASAVA FOLLOWERS , WHO WILL BURY THEIR DEAD. 

CP BROWN DROVE TELUGUS AS SLAVES ABROAD BY DELIBERATE FAMINE HE CREATED IN TELUGU LAND 

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2010/04/indentured-coolie-slavery-reinvented.html

MODI RAN FASTER THAN USAIN BOLT TO INAUGURATE A STATUE OF BASAVA ON THE BANKS OF THE RIVER THAMES IN LONDON.. 

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2015/04/cp-brown-and-yogi-vemana-capt-ajit.html


BBB ) MGR AND JAYALALITAA WERE STAUNCH HINDUS WHO WANTED TO BE CREMATED BUT BOTH WERE BURIED. MIND YOU THIS DUO WERE HEROES FOR TAMILS

MGR WAS MADE A PUPPET IN THE LAST YEARS OF HIS LIFE--HE WAS A VEGETABLE . DURING THIS PERIOD LTTE AND PRABHAKARAN BECAME CHRISTIAN .

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2012/08/aidmk-dmk-misplaced-support-for-ltte.html

THE ENTIRE COASTAL BELT OF TAMIL NADU BECAME CHRISTIAN --AND THE MOTHER OF ALL SCAMS--THE THORIUM SCAM TOOK PLACE . 

JAYALALITHA HAD PLUS SECURITY. SHE WAS ABANDONED IN A HOSPITAL--HER LEGS WERE CUT AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE VIDEO IN THE POST BELOW (YOU CANT MORPH IT ) . 

PEOPLE IN POWER JUST PRETEND TO SLEEP .  YOU TRY WAKING THEM UP

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2017/09/inquiry-into-death-of-cm-of-tamil-nadu.html

THIS IS JUST TWO EXAMPLES AMONG MORE THAN A THOUSAND

AMERICAN ARE QUICK TO RIDICULE CENTRAL AND SOUTH AMERICAN NATIONS AS "BANANA REPUBLICS"

IN REALITY USA IS THE GREATEST BANANA REPUBLIC

ALL THEIR PRESIDENTS HAVE BEEN PUPPETS OF JEW ROTHSCHILD .

EXCEPT FOR ONE-- ANDREW JACKSON

THE FIRST US PRESIDENT GEORGE WASHINGTON WAS AN IMPOSTER . THE REAL MAN WAS MURDERED AND HIS PLACE TAKEN BY A GERMAN JEW NAMED ADAM WEISHAUPT

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2010/12/dirty-secrets-of-boston-tea-party-capt.html

BANANA WAS UNITED FRUIT MAAL.

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2012/09/will-india-be-banana-republic-walmart_18.html

HOW DID WE LOSE ALL OUR HUMPED BULLS ? ( WHITE REVOLUTION ) 

HOW DID WE LOSE 90% OF OUR LAKES IN 55 YEARS FLAT ? ( GREEN REVOLUTION )

HOW DID INDIANS BECOME GUINEA PIGS FOR KOSHER EVIL PHARMA ?

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2016/03/say-no-to-hpv-vaccination-for-indian.html

HOW DID LAKHS OF SHELL COMPANIES COME TO INDIA?


NOW WE ARE SELLING OUR FINANCIAL SYSTEM -- TO KOSHER INTEL -- BY A "PROOF OF ELAPSED TIME" BLOCKCHAIN WHICH HAS NOT BEEN TESTED .
WE HAVE GUJJU NO 2 PRAYING TO GUJJU NO1 --AND RUNNING FASTER THAN USAIN BOLT ABROAD , TO INAUGURATE EVERY GANDHI STATUE MADE BY ROTHSCHILDs AGENTS .

WE WATCH

THIS BLOGSITE WILL WRITE LEGACIES --NOT ROTHSCHILDs MEDIA OR HISTORIANS 

capt ajit vadakayil
..


BITCOIN HAS JUMPED TO 8270 USD .     



WHEN SUCH A SPIKE HAPPENS IT MEANS SOMEBODY IS LAUGHING ALL THE WAY TO THE KOSHER BANK


Tether  has issued more than 300m tokens over the past seven days. A staggering amount, to say the least. They keep issuing money  – like a central bank – at an alarming rate. There is almost $1bn USDT in circulation at this time. For a currency pegged to the US Dollar, Tether is extremely shady

Tether used to have a different name – Realcoin.

It used to be an ordinary altcoin which was rather popular among traders but could not compete with Litecoin, Namecoin and other cryptocurrencies.  Tether owners decided that rebranding will have positive impact on their business

Actually it's not that easy to explain how Tether works. If we simplify the system to the maximum possible extent we could describe Tether as a service turning USD, EUR and other fiat currencies into virtual (digital) tokens which are later send and received with the use of Bitcoin blockchain.

In other words Tether is kind of a digital tie to tangible assets of the real worlds. Technically it is not even a cryptocurrency – it is more a way for using fiat currencies like electronic currencies.

Basically Tether allows to make online transactions with tokens (which can be called a cryptocurrency too) equal to US dollars. That is a good alternative to volatile Bitcoin since USD exchange rate is much more stable  .

One Tether token (USDT) is always equal to one US dollar. This cannot be changed and it convinces us that volatility typical for electronic currencies is not a serious threat for us.

Using Tether you never have to worry about currency exchange rate – USD is the most stable currency in the world and USDT is directly bound to the USD dollar. It means that you do not have to put much funds at the risk.

By combining principles of digital and fiat currencies Tether  disturbs the balance of the global financial market.   People who earn on buying and selling online have already realized that it's possible to earn a lot with Tether.



TILL THIS BLOGSITE PENNED AT 33 PART SERIES ON SHELL COMPANIES,  LAKHS OF SHELL COMPANIES WERE BLEEDING BHARTAMATA

ALMOST EVERY SUPER RICH BIG FISH IN INDIA OPERATED SHELL COMPANIES .

IPL CRICKET TEAM OWNERS SIGNED THEIR CONTRACTS USING SHELL COMPANIES.   LALIT MODI KNOWS WHO THEY ARE


JUST WHO THE HELL IS BCCI ?   

AN NGO STARTED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD!


WHY WAS BCCI BEING MANAGED ( STILL BEING MANAGED ) BY POWERFUL POLITICIANS  ( BOTH PANDAVAS AND KAURAVAS ) AND EX-ROTHSCHILDs OPIUM DRUG RUNNING AGENTS ?

ENRON RAPED BHARATMATA.

THERE WAS NOBODY IN INDIA SMART ENOUGH TO POINT OUT THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM




ENRONs REBECCA MARKS CAME IN MINI SKIRT AND FLASHED HER PUSSY AT INDIAN MEN WHO MATTER


Nobeatingroundthebush
May 28, 2017 at 12:50 PM

Rebecca Mark the high profile sexy high flying Globe-trotting in stiletto heels and a miniskirt Enron top executive who zoomed up the corporate ladder in a jiffy and who met Bal Thackeray at his home when Enron India was being set up.....

IS NOW MANAGING HER CATTLE RANCH IN TAOS New Mexico of course with millions of dollars in the bank...


Capt. Ajit Vadakayil
May 28, 2017 at 1:37 PM

http://archive.indianexpress.com/Picture-Gallery/1878/21/1

OH YES

I KNOW WHICH ALL INDIANS REBECCA BABY MET --I HAVE KEPT TRACK

SOME IN PUBLIC-- SOME IN SECRET WITH EXTRA SHORT MINI SKIRT

http://www.daijiworld.com/news/newsDisplay.aspx?newsID=239389

SHE WON THE DHABOL DEAL BY ALLOWING INDIAN LEADERS TO SEE HER MICRO THONGS --SHARON STONE STYLE

https://www.xvideos.com/video158458/sharon_stone_pussy_shots

Rebecca Mark's name is NEVER uttered in the list of Enron's main miscreants. Her disappearing act is even more remarkable given the size and scope of the failed ENRON

She was too young and inexperienced to hold such a high post. She was a farmer's daughter who worked her ass off in the fields

When she worked at Houston Natural Gas --she was known to do a Monika Lewinsky to her boss JEW John Wing--who treated her like dirt

One prominent (female) stock analyst said " Rebecca got to the top on her back."

At a party to celebrate the bagging of ENRON project at Dhabol she brought a elephant into a resort outside Houston --at the same party, she was dressed in leather-and then she rode in on the back of a Harley-Davidson

I HAD MET AN ENRON EMPLOYEE IN USA WHO TOLD ME HOW SHE "CHARMED" SOME INDIANS TO GET THE DHABOL PROJECT --I KNOW THOSE BASTARDS WHO WANTED TO SEE HER IN A SARI.

WORLD BANK KNOWING THAT PUSSY POWER WAS HAPPENING AT DHABOL--REFUSED TO FINANCE THE ENRON PROJECT

By early December 1993, Mark had all the signatures she needed. The Indian government signed a contract requiring it to pay Enron about $1.3 billion per year, or about $26 billion over the life of the 20-year contract. It was, THE of the largest civilian or military contracts ever signed, anywhere on the globe --in a jiffy

Over the life of the contract, India would pay Enron and its partners nearly nine times what Dabhol had cost.

Furthermore, India was required to pay for any cost increases caused by price hikes associated with the plant's fuel, electricity transmission lines or plant maintenance.

The final insult of the contract was a stipulation that required India to pay Enron in American dollars, even though the Indian rupee was undergoing regular depreciation.

SOME DESH BHAKT INDIANS OBJECTED .

On August 26, 1993, Rebecca baby faxed a signed letter to CM of Maharashtra Sharad Pawar, complaining about an Indian named MISTER BEG and demanding that contract be signed

She was twice named as one of the 50 most powerful businesswomen in America by Fortune magazine –using PUSSY power

She used her femininity and no-nonsense manner first to disarm the men she dealt with, then bulldoze through any resistance that remained. She was a devastating success.


Rebecca baby using PUSSY power had negotiated a WIN -LOSE contract.

Between 1996 and 1998, in just two years her total compensation was more than 28 million USD -more than any other Enron employee during that time-- a huge amount of money those days

By 1998, she was named vice chairman of the Enron board and held voting power on more stock than anyone else on the board except for Robert Belfer, Lay and Skilling.

I HAVE SEEN SUCH WOMEN- I KNOW HOW THEY OPERATE USING SHARON STONE TACTICS

capt ajit vadakayil
..



Capt. Ajit Vadakayil
May 28, 2017 at 2:24 PM

http://postcard.news/dhobal-case-congress-government-hire-pakistani-lawyer-fight-india/

WE INDIANS WANT THE ENRON BRIBERY CASE TO BE OPENED UP

EVERYBODY IN ENRON KNOWS WHICH BIG FISH INDIAN POLITICIAN WAS BRIBED !!

Capt ajit vadakayil

..




WAR IS PEACE

WHITE IS BLACK

SUNRISE IS SUNSET 

WOLF IS SHEEP


FOUR LEGS GOOD, TWO LEGS BAD 

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/banking/finance/banking/sbi-to-use-blockchain-for-smart-contracts-and-kyc-by-next-month/articleshow/61715860.cms

Like I said , Chipmaker Intel has come up with its own alternative consensus protocol called proof of elapsed time. This system works similarly to proof of work, but consumes far less electricity.

Further, instead of having participants solve a cryptographic puzzle, the algorithm uses a trusted execution environment (TEE) – such as SGX – to ensure blocks get produced in a random lottery fashion, but without the required work.

Intel’s approach is based on a guaranteed wait time provided through the TEE. According to Intel, the poof-of-elapsed-time algorithm scales to thousands of nodes and will run efficiently on any Intel processor that supports SGX. This is NOT tested and there is NO proof available.

INTEL TELLS INDIA- TRUST US.

YES WE TRUSTED THE WHITE JEW ROTHSCHILD BEFORE—

WE KNOW WHAT HAPPENED WITH ROTHSCHILD WHO CAME AS A SPICE TRADER AND THEN TOOK OVER INDIA

I ASK MODI AND JAITLEY—

WHY ARE YOU PUTTING TRUST IN KOSHER INTEL ?
IMPORTANT QUESTION::   WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF BLOCKCHAIN,   IF YOU CAN WRAP YOUR FEEBLE KOSHER INFESTED / INFECTED MINDS AROUND IT ?

IS IT NOT TO GET AWAY FROM “SHEEP TRUSTING THE WOLF” SCENARIO ?

MODI AND JAITLEY AND YOUR SBI CHAIRMAN SIDEKICK —  WHAT IS YOUR AGENDA ?   DO YOU UNDERSTAND BASICS?

WHAT IS THE TEARING HURRY ?

BATAAO NAH ?

PLEAJJJJE ? KINDLY !

WE THE PEOPLE KNOW WHEN TO PUT OUR RULERS IN JAIL — THOSE DAYS OF POLITICAL IMMUNITY AFFORDED BY POWERFUL JEWS FROM ABROAD ARE LONG GONE.


http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2017/11/blockchain-proof-of-elapsed-time-intel.html

###################

PUT THIS COMMENT IN THE WEBSITES OF---

PMO

PM MODI

FINANCE MINISTRY

ARUN JAITLEY

SWAMY

GURUMURTHY

CJI

LAW MINISTER

I&B MINISTRY

EDUCATION MINISTRY

DEFENCE MINISTER

YOGI ADITYANATH

SUPREME COURT BAR COUNCIL

MEA

SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA

Capt ajit vadakyil
..

Sawtooth Lake features an EXPERIMENTAL ( HULLO ARUN JAITLEY  ???   IS INDIA A GUINEA PIG ??? )  experimental consensus algorithm called Proof of Elapsed Time (PoET) that relies on trusted computing to deliver a more efficient consensus. 

Trusted execution environments (TEE), such as Intel Software Guard Extensions (SGX) included on recent Intel processors support the PoET algorithm, which scales to support thousands of participants. 

Intel has since contributed the Sawtooth Lake code to the open source Hyperledger project, where it can be downloaded and appraised without need for SGX hardware. 

However, being a simulation this is not a secure implementation but it provides one way of exploring an area of technology




AVK
November 21, 2017 at 12:19 PM

There have been many effect of Respected Captain - IPS Roopa getting presidential police award.. _/\_ Captain!

#######################

TODAY CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL WILL HAVE AN EXTRA BEER

MY 12 PART SERIES ON POLICE REFORMS IS JUST 40% -- I STOPPED IT THINKING OUR ROTTEN SYSTEM WILL NEVER IMPROVE

I KNOW HOW THE MANNARGUDI MAFIA CONTROLLED TAMIL NADU POLICE/ JUDICIARY/ POLITICIANS/ IAS BABUS ETC. I HAVE PERSONAL EXPERIENCE..

ROOPA HAS BALLS !

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2017/07/police-reforms-in-india-much-more-with.html

WE CONGRATULATE ROOPA

PUT THIS COMMENT IN HER WEBSITE , AND ALSO PMO, PM MODI, HOME MINISTER , LAW MINISTER, CJI.

capt ajit vadakayil
..


Bitcoin hit an all high of  $US8270 for the first time yesterday .  This is similar to the dotcom bubble and  Dutch tulip mania of the 17th century. After a more than 700 per cent increase in value since the start of the year, bitcoin’s market capitalisation — the price multiplied by the number of bitcoins in circulation — now sits at more than $US137 billion

The market capitalisation of all cryptocurrencies, including Ethereum, Ripple and Bitcoin Cash — a “fork” of the main bitcoin line — is now more than $US243 billion.

Bitcoin is rising faster than any asset class we have seen over the last 400 years
According to Katsunori Sago, the chief investment officer at Japan Post Bank,  the fair value of bitcoin should be around $US100 — nearly 99 per cent below its current level

Tether, the issuer of currency-pegged tokens USDT, announced a hack that happened on November 19, 2017, when more than $30 million's worth of USDT was withdrawn to an unauthorized address and hence lost.

The company announced that:--

" $30,950,010 USDT was removed from the Tether Treasury wallet on November 19, 2017 and sent to an unauthorized bitcoin address. As Tether is the issuer of the USDT managed asset, we will not redeem any of the stolen tokens, and we are in the process of attempting token recovery to prevent them from entering the broader ecosystem."

"The attacker is holding funds in the following address: --16tg2RJuEPtZooy18Wxn2me2RhUdC94N7r. If you receive any USDT tokens from the above address, or from any downstream address that receives these tokens, do not accept them, as they have been flagged and will not be redeemable by Tether for USD."

In essence, the hack has destroyed one of the larger USDT liquidity injections that happened in November and that some users link to a disproportionate rise in Bitcoin's price.

After the announcement, crypto assets lost the recent heights, with Bitcoin crashing from above $8,200 to $7,700.

Three days ago, experts noticed a strange move of Tethers to an address not belonging to Bitfinex or any known exchange on the Rich List. It turns out to be the hacker's address

Tether will offer new software builds that will freeze the funds and not allow them to be moved and exchanged. In the past day, users reported frozen wallets, and the freeze may continue, putting several exchanges and digital assets under stress.

CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL HAD PREDICTED THIS TWO DAYS AGO , RIGHT ? 

IT IS ON RECORD IN THIS SERIES.

WHAT CAN YOU EXPECT FROM OUR PEA BRAINED CHOOTIYA INDIAN MAIN STREAM BENAMI MEDIA?

VVIP RACISM—POT HOLES—BOLLYWOOD—CRICKET— NONEXISTANT RAPE IN INDIA—INTOLERANCE BY HINDUS DUBBED AS FRINGE IN OUR OWN LAND –

YES—  WE KNOW WHY MODI CHOSE THAT BOLLYWOOD STARLET SMRITI IRANI  AS INDIAs I&B MINISTER

--HER JOB IS TO GIVE HER BOSS MODI A FAALTHU  EGO MASSAGE GHADI GHADI 



CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL DECLARES-- 


EVERY HACK OF CRYPTO CURRENCY IS AN INSIDE JOB 


Out of an estimated 1.6 billion USD invested in ICOs MORE than 200 million ended up in the hands of criminals --almost all are INSIDE jobs .

Some of these heists have been considerable.   The DAO, for example, was famously hacked and saw 55 million siphoned off by cyber-criminals.

Omni Core is used by Tether integrators to support Omni layer transactions. Through the software, Tether has the authority to prevent the movement of stolen coins from the hacker’s address.

Such level of centralization exposes Tether of fund and network manipulation, considering that with pressure from the law enforcement, the Tether development team is able to prevent funds from moving the across the network and disable certain addresses indefinitely.  

Public blockchain networks such as bitcoin are valuable because of their security value. Their immutable, decentralized, and unalterable nature eliminates the possibility of government interference, creating independent economies and protocols that operate by strict network rules.


The fact that addresses and funds within the Tether network can be easily altered and manipulated by a small group of network operators presents a dangerous vulnerability as a blockchain network, and also raises a question on the necessity of blockchain technology, considering that it is difficult to consider or justify Tether as a decentralized and public blockchain network.



Tether is not exactly a big player in the cryptocurrency scene, like bitcoin or Ethereum are.   It’s only supposed to act as a proxy for national currencies such as the dollar, euro and yen, for tasks such as settling balances between exchanges. 

It uses blockchain technology, but claims to avoid bitcoin’s volatility through its currency pegs.


Kraken is a US based the world's largest bitcoin exchange in euro volume and liquidity 

In the past few weeks Tether has been  providing unaudited, artificial liquidity to the Bitcoin markets and inflating the price. 

Kraken, one of the main USDT markets for moving to fiat, has moved USDT offline, waiting for an upgrade to correct the tether theft.


Tether and Bitfinex must come under scrutiny for a form of hidden asset price manipulation.


One of the partners that uses Tether is crypto exchange Bitfinex, which itself lost 119,756 bitcoin — then worth $72 million but valued at over $950 million today — in a hack in Aug 2016  This was stolen from the exchange platform Bitfinex in Hong Kong..

The bitcoin was stolen from users’ segregated wallets..

The security breach came two months after Bitfinex was ordered to pay a $75,000 fine by the U.S. Commodity and Futures Trading Commission in part for offering illegal off-exchange financed commodity transactions in bitcoin and other digital currencies.

Bitfinex had announced a tie-up with Palo Alto-based BitGo, which uses multiple-signature security to store user deposits online, allowing for faster withdrawals. 

The scandal highlighted the risks of companies using cryptography for their ledgers.. The more you rely on its benefits, the greater the potential for damage when keys are stolen 

It is SURE that the theft was an inside job –as it is difficult for hacckers togain access to the system externally. 

Yesterday’s hack ( 31 million USD )  is sure to throw up more questions about the relationship between Tether and the secretive exchange Bitfinex..

The duo are rumored to share owners, and have been accused of leaning on each other to manipulate the market.

Any idiot can figure out that this is an INSIDE JOB

Tether, with a market capitalization of $675 million, is the world’s 20th most-valuable virtual currency

Skepticism had already been building after the company behind the tokens said in April that all international wires had been blocked by its Taiwanese banks. That fueled questions about whether the tokens were fully backed back fiat currencies. 

Tether’s users are unlikely to abandon it as long as it is supported by exchanges and no other credible pegged token appears


Devasini Giancarlo CFO at Bitfinex and Director at Tether was listed in the Paradise Papers.

Below: WHO THE FUCK IS APPLEBY ?



Tether and Bitfinex have insisted that the 2 operations are separate. 

But leaked paperwork called the Paradise Papers, which had been made public this month, present that Appleby, an offshore legislation agency, helped  Potter and Mr. Devasini, the Bitfinex operators, arrange Tether within the British Virgin Islands in late 2014. 

The operations of law firm Appleby are under the spotlight after millions of its documents were disclosed in the Paradise Papers leak.   

Appleby is one of the handful of major international "offshore legal service providers". Its business is to help clients, be they financial institutions, global corporations or high-net-worth individuals, to set up and register companies and trusts in overseas jurisdictions with low or zero tax rates and high financial confidentiality.

It's the kind of work which, inevitably, can lead to contact with KOSHER CLIENTS who have chequered backgrounds, controversial reputations or opaque motives.
Appleby was named offshore firm of the year by Legal 500 UK in 2015. Such reputations are hard won. 

The first Appleby practice was established in Bermuda by Rothschild’s agent Major Reginald Appleby in 1890.. 

By 1903 he was a justice of the peace when he sat on the marine court of inquiry to take care of British East India Company ( owned by Jew Rothschild ) shipping matters .. 

Appleby was made a Commander of the Order of the British Empire by Rothschild.

Though the 119-year-old Appleby is not a tax adviser, it is a member of a global network that sets up offshore companies for clients eager to avoid taxes or keep their finances hidden. 

Since expanding outside Bermuda in 1979, Appleby has transformed itself into a global institution with more than 700 employees across nearly every major tax haven from the Cayman Islands, to the Isle of Man, Mauritius and Hong Kong.

Appleby's corporate clients include Barclays Group, Citibank, Credit Suisse, Goldman Sachs, HSBC Bank, ­JPMorgan Chase, KPMG, ­Lloyds Banking Group, PwC, Royal Bank of Scotland Group, Santander UK and Standard Chartered—and several Rothshild’s agents

 Today, Appleby makes millions  and is a key player in what insiders call the "offshore magic circle" — an informal collection of the world’s biggest offshore law firms. Anybody who treads on their toes is sued to eternity 

Appleby’s internal records reveal a preoccupation with secrecy that pervades tax havens. For this reason, governments around the world are targeting the law firms that operate in tax havens, to force them to reveal the hidden transactions that deprive public coffers of trillions of dollars each year.

Unlike last year’s Panama Papers leak, which exposed Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca, a firm that has been criticized as a bad apple in the offshore world, the Paradise Papers leak reveals the business of one of the world’s most prestigious blue-chip law firms, Appleby, which caters to the world’s biggest multinational corporations and the wealthiest families on the planet.

Documents found in the 6.8 million internal Appleby files in the leak show the firm was aware of multiple cases where it accepted dirty money. Appleby is already publicly associated with the Bermuda Longtail Trust, one of the biggest tax scams in recent Canadian history. 

The scam, originally revealed by a Star investigation in 2007, duped almost 10,000 people, including nurses, teachers and at least one police officer, into making donations to bogus charities in order to receive a tax receipt worth four times more. 

Appleby administered the trust for Canadian businessman Edward Furtak. The trust had collected more than $100 million by the time the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) got wise to the scheme, and a group of clients sued. Appleby settled the class action for $17.5 million last summer

The Sun Group, Jindal Steel, Apollo Tyres, Havells, Hindujas, Emaar MGF, Videocon, Amitabh Bachchan  and the Hiranandani Group are among the major firms on the Paradise papers list. 

At least 714 Indians are named in documents leaked from two financial companies – Bermuda’s Appleby and Singapore’s Asiaciti – that help the rich and the powerful move their money abroad and invest it in 19 tax havens. 

The information was released by United States-based International Consortium of Investigative Journalists. Nand Lal Khemka’s Sun Group, Appleby’s second-largest client with 118 different offshore entities, was also mentioned in the list.. 

Several prominent companies under the scanner of the Central Bureau of Investigation and the Enforcement Directorate are listed as Appleby’s clients. 

These include firms named in the Sun-TV-Aircel-Maxis case, the Essar-Loop 2G case, the Rajasthan ambulance scam that is currently being investigated by the CBI. The investigating agency had named a company called Ziquista Healthcare, where Sachin Pilot and Karti Chidambaram were early honorary and independent directors.

Among the individuals named in the leak are actor Amitabh Bachchan, Union minister Jayant Sinha, Bharatiya Janata Party’s Rajya Sabha MP RK Sinha, and corporate lobbyist Niira Radia. Jayant Sinha’s name figures in the list because of his former role within the Omidyar Network.

This cache of documents were obtained by German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung. Most of the papers scrutinised are from Appleby which helps its clients set up offshore companies and manage their bank accounts to help them either avoid or evade taxes, manage their real estate properties, open escrow accounts, or move millions across the globe..

These days, no exchange is bigger than Bitfinex, an opaque operation that provides no information on its website about where it is or who operates the company. 

Bitfinex, which is officially incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, has been fined by regulators in the United States and cut off by American banks, and it has lost millions of dollars of customer money in two separate hackings, leading critics to question whether it even has the money it claims to hold.

The chief executive of Bitfinex and Tether is the same man- Jan Ludovicus van der Veld

The liquid nature of the Bitcoin markets, flowing round nationwide borders and legal guidelines, is a product of the digital forex’s uncommon construction. Bitcoin is saved and moved by means of a decentralized community of computer systems that aren’t underneath the management of any single firm or authorities. 

This construction signifies that the digital forex continues to be a straightforward goal for individuals who need to manipulate its worth or use it to launder cash.
Unregulated, unregistered exchanges are a very big concern for the industry and the community broadly.. 

The most frequent face of Bitfinex is its chief technique officer, Phil Potter..  Potter,runs Bitfinex alongside Mr. Van der Velde, a Dutch-speaking man dwelling in Hong Kong, and Giancarlo Devasini, an Italian man who lives on the French Riviera, in accordance with firm filings in Hong Kong.

Before the 31 million hack two days ago, the firm misplaced 1,500 Bitcoin, value round $400,000, to a hacker in 2015. But probably the most damaging incident occurred in August 2016 when a thief obtained nearly 120,000 Bitcoin, value round $75 million on the time.  

All three are inside jobs.

The firm unfold out the losses to all clients — even those that weren’t holding Bitcoin on the time of the hacking — by forcing clients to take a 36 % haircut or loss on any cash on the change.

Wells Fargo stated this year that it will not transfer cash from Bitfinex accounts. Shortly after, Bitfinex stated its major banks in Taiwan had been shutting it off. 

Since then, it has moved between a collection of banks in different international locations, with out telling clients the place the change’s cash is saved.

Customers can purchase Tether cash on Bitfinex after which switch them to different digital forex exchanges, offering a strategy to transfer between international locations with out going by means of banks. 

In current weeks, a couple of hundred hundreds of thousands ’ value of Tether has modified fingers each day throughout a number of exchanges

Again, the core of the Paradise Papers leak, totaling more than 13.4 million documents, focuses on the Bermudan law firm Appleby, a 119-year old company founded by Jew Rothschild , that caters to blue chip corporations and very wealthy people who laundered their dirty money.

Appleby helps clients reduce their tax burden; obscure their ownership of assets like companies, private aircraft, real estate and yachts; and set up huge offshore trusts that in some cases hold billions of dollars.

The predominantly elite clients of Appleby contrast with those of Mossack Fonseca — the company whose leaked records became the Panama Papers — which appeared to be less discriminating in the business it took on. The records date back to 1950 and up to 2016.

Appleby has offices in tax havens around the world. In addition to its Bermudan headquarters, it works out of places like the British Virgin Islands and the Cayman Islands in the Caribbean; the Isle of Man, Jersey and Guernsey off Britain; Mauritius and the Seychelles in the Indian Ocean; and Hong Kong and Shanghai.

The documents come not only from Appleby, but also from the Singaporean company Asiaciti Trust and official business registries in places such as Bermuda, the Cayman Islands, Lebanon and Malta.

On 15 November 2017, the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) released its first story from the half a million documents leaked from the Singapore headquarters of AsiaCiti Trust. 

AsiaCiti Trust is an international trust and corporate services provider with operations in Hong Kong, the Cook Islands, Dubai, Nevis, New Zealand, Panama and Samoa.

Both AsiaCiti and its Australian founder and Chairman Graeme Walter Briggs appear in the Panama Papers, including having shared ownership of several companies with the now-infamous offshore law firm Mossack Fonseca.

Singapore’s corporate tax rate is 17%, [rating] among the lowest in the world. In 2016 a report by Oxfam ranked Singapore as the world’s fifth worst corporate tax haven.

The report claims that these countries are creating a “race to the bottom” which undermines the entire global taxation system, through a combination of policies including ever-lower corporate tax rates and anonymity as a shelter from tax authorities in other jurisdictions.

Flows of wealth from other jurisdictions have helped to buoy Singapore’s private banking industry

Singapore and similar jurisdictions including Switzerland and the UK play a crucial role as conduits between jurisdictions where wealth originates and so-called ‘sink’ jurisdictions such as the Cayman Islands or Panama.

Conduit offshore financial centres generally have low or zero taxes imposed on the transfer of capital to other countries, either via interest payments, royalties, dividends or profit repatriation, and highly developed legal systems to help channel and disperse wealth to ‘sink’ jurisdictions.

This is exactly the pattern of behaviour which the Paradise Papers have exposed at AsiaCiti Trust, which takes in wealth from its clients in the USA, China, Switzerland, Romania, Nigeria, Thailand and South Africa and re-routes it via Singapore to corporations in Samoa, the Cook Islands and Panama

Again, Tether and Bitfinex have insisted that the two operations are separate. But leaked documents , Paradise Papers,  show that Appleby, an offshore law firm, helped Mr. Potter and Mr. Devasini, the Bitfinex operators, set up Tether in the British Virgin Islands in late 2014.


According to their terms of service Bitfinex consists of two BVI corporations, for U.S. customers: BFXNA Inc and for all other regions iFinex Inc

IFinex Inc. (BVI) operates as a financial technology company. The company owns and operates Bitfinex

Wells Fargo does NOT allow customers withdraw the money controlled by iFinex and Tether anymore

IFINEX, a BVI company, is the legal owner of Bitfinex, Tether and Blockstream, among others. One for trading, one for printing (out of thin air) USDT and one controlling Bitcoin development.

Blockstream is a blockchain technology company-- they provide funding for the development of Bitcoin Core, the predominant network client software. 

Blockstream employs several prominent bitcoin developers.  

Blockstream is one of the largest contributors of funding for Bitcoin Core-- the reference client of bitcoin. It is the reference implementation for bitcoin nodes, which form the bitcoin network. Through changes to Bitcoin Core, its developers make changes to the underlying bitcoin protocol.

Bitcoin Core includes a transaction verification engine and connects to the bitcoin network as a full node. Moreover, a cryptocurrency wallet, which can be used to transfer funds, is included by default  The wallet allows for the sending and receiving of bitcoins. 

It does not facilitate the buying or selling of bitcoin. It allows users to generate QR codes to receive payment. The software validates the entire blockchain, which includes all bitcoin transactions ever. 

Blockstream participates in Hyperledger as a general member.. The Hyperledger project is a cross-industry collaborative effort to create blockchain based open standard for distributed ledgers for globally conducted business transactions.

Bitfinex is using Tether in its margin markets for wash trading.

“I GOT BITFINEXED” WILL SOON BE A TERM FOR ”I GOT FUCKED”




The Monetary Authority of Singapore, the country’s central bank, is pressing ahead with regulation that will bring a handful of retail payment services, including bitcoin and cryptocurrency exchanges, under a single legislation. 

As regulator, the MAS will have oversight to look into money laundering and terrorism financing risks as well as ensuring safeguards for consumers’ funds.

When enacted, payment firms, as well as bitcoin exchanges, will be required to hold only one license under the new regulatory framework.

The new framework will expand the scope of regulation to include domestic money transfers, merchant acquisition and the purchase and sale of virtual currencies..

Bitfinex handles around 11% of the current Bitcoin trading volume, and at the moment.. .  Again, the Bitfinex CSO Philip Potter is also listed as the director of Tether Holdings Limited, per the recent leak in the Paradise Papers.





BitConnect is a Cryptocurrency​ that facilitates the Lending of capital through Blockchain​ Technology​. BitConnect was launched on November 15, 2016. It was released as an open source software in January 2017. 

It's a peer-to-peer Cryptocurrency​ in which transactions take place between users directly, without an intermediary. These transactions are verified by network nodes and recorded in a public distributed ledger called the blockchain using Proof of Work(PoW) and Proof of Stake(PoS) algorithm.. 

BitConnect Coin mining differs from Bitcoin because it's mining is based on CPU/GPU, unlike Bitcoin​ which is based on ASIC miner.

The most brazen of BitConnect’s  marketing is a pyramid info-graphic depicting different percentage awards depending on the “level” of member a user is. It’s little wonder therefore that the UK have given BitConnect an ultimatum.

BitConnect (BCC) has come under scrutiny from UK authorities. The company has been threatened with closure as well as having their assets seized if they’re unable to prove that they are not a ponzi scheme. 

Failure to provide evidence of “cause to the contrary” would result in the UK Registrar of Companies forcing the closure of BitConnect.

BitConnect, was registered by a British man under the name Ken Fitzsimmons. Interestingly, the name doesn’t appear anywhere within BitConnect’s own literature leaving the community with considerable doubt about the legitimacy of the platform.

Bitconnect has been showing signs recently that its top promoters are jumping ship.


Accusations of wash trading at Bitfinex – “printing” tethers and using them to artificially bump the price of bitcoin before cashing out, sending the USD to Tether, and repeating the cycle – aren’t the only ones the exchange has been facing. 

Why doesn’t Bitfinex reveal its current banking arrangements or where its money is stored?   The company did produce a financial statement in September 2017, but it failed to prove that each tether is backed by a US dollar.

Bitfinex had a falling out with Wells Fargo, the last bank that was willing to process their transactions last year. And shortly after, they suffered the largest Bitcoin robbery since Mt Gox—in August 2016, the exchange lost 120,000 BTC to what it says was a hack. 

It didn’t help that their decision to “distribute the losses equally” amongst user accounts was met with controversy. Neither did the fact that they gave no clear explanation as to how exactly the hack happened. 

Although they were able to “pay off” users by offering them equity, the lack of transparency and refusal to submit to audit compliance did not sit well with the public.

Or maybe they do have a bank, but can’t admit it to the public because the bank they’re banking with unwittingly dealt with them through one of their shell companies.

To circumvent the banking problem, Bitfinex is likely employing Hawala banking.

Bitfinex essentially match-makes you with someone wanting to withdraw from their exchange, and you send the money directly to the other party withdrawing.

No major bank wants to partner up with Bitfinex, so they’re pumping the price of BTC in order to keep a steady flow of depositors and keep them from cashing out of the exchange. 

And while the pump part of this isn’t scary from a HODLer’s perspective—it’s the dump that is.   

HODL is used for "hold" - it's a term that was invented by a psycho who did a typo and it became famous.   Whenever people talk here about holding their coins, they would rather say "hodl your bitcoins".

The minute the prices of Bitcoin turns bearish, and the prices continuously fall, eventually people will stop catching knives, money coming in comes to a trickle, and people are wanting to withdraw and nobody wants to deposit.

So, the only choice Bitfinex has, is to relentlessly manipulate the price of Bitcoin up for as long as possible so that people always want to deposit, until they are able to re-establish a legitimate banking partner

 It has now  emerged that Bitfinex has yet another new bank. 

This time, its European home is with the obscure Bank Polskiej Spółdzielczości – also the home of CEX.io – under the name of CRYPTO SP.ZO.O. 

Why isn’t Bitfinex using its own name and why is it with a bank that ranks 15th in Poland in terms of asset value and 26th in terms of number of outlets? The director of Bank Polskiej Spółdzielczości is Molina Lee Ivan Manuel who is also the director of numerous Panamanian shell companies. 

Offshore shell companies are a recurring theme with Bitfinex; the so-called Paradise Papers, which leaked this month, show that Bitfinex’ operators used an offshore firm to help them incorporate Tether in the British Virgin Islands.

Tether itself has also been shady, marketing their tokens as “money for the internet,” yet repeatedly stating in the less conspicuous legal section of their website that Tethers are not money and that they are under no obligation to exchange users’ Tethers with actual money.


Despite shady banking, dubious use of tethers, another hack, and slow withdrawals, Bitfinex is flexing its muscles..


What Intel claims to be a Blockchain is a misnomer—it is a consensus protocol for distrusted systems….generically. 

Proof of Elapsed Time is just one of the many useful capabilities that can be built based on Intel’s Secure Guard Extensions (SGX)

PoET as used in Intel’s Sawtooth platform will probably not see mass adoption in public networks due to its dependence on Intel chips – but for SOLD OUT bastards ( to white Jews ) and IGNORANT Indian politicians--

These CUNTS don’t know that relying 100% on Intel means total CENTRALISATION ( and not 100% decentralization boasted by blockchain )

For private and consortium networks it is a viable and superior alternative to proof of work (mining). Proof of Work induced mining wastes electricity

Intel’s SGX platform would allow you to execute an instruction which says ret=elapseTime(1omins); 

Once you execute this statement, the SGX platforms will “discuss” amongst themselves and choose a single leader. The “discussion” will be according to Intel fair, reliable and secure i.e. leader selection is random and uniformly distributed such that everyone has a chance of becoming a leader. 

Now lets say, i have 8 SGX chips and you have 2 SGX chips … between ourselves i have 80% chance of becoming a leader and you have 20%. Thus essentially it becomes a race as to who owns most number of SGX chips.

Bitfinex exercises control over Tether — enough to print off millions of unbacked Tether at their whim.

Tethers are being used to purchase Bitcoin, this is artificially inflating the price of BTC, since all the new Tethers are being used to purchase Bitcoin.
Tether is a bit of an unusual cryptocurrency. Unlike most coins, it’s not aiming for moon. It’s content to stay firmly on the ground, pegged to the US dollar.

The idea is to provide a way to trade USD (with all of its stability) with all the benefits of a cryptocurrency. Basically, crypto-freedom without crypto-volatility. All new Tether are created by the Tether Company. They will create as many new Tether as someone is willing to deposit dollars into their bank accounts. 

The full amount will be stored in USD, and at any time, someone can redeem any amount of Tether back from the company for USD at a 1:1 ratio.  All the exchange did was exchange one type of unbacked IOU (the BFX token) with another (Tether)!


Tether is primarily used to buy Bitcoin back, and it does have a tremendously high volume. It has 24h volume periods cracking half a billion dollars, regularly rivaling BCH or ETH. But its aggregate value is still under $700 million. That might seem like a lot, but is less than 0.5% of Bitcoin’s whopping $140 billion market cap.

















Bitcoin uses the hashcash Proof of Work function as the Bitcoin mining core. All bitcoin miners whether CPU, GPU, FPGA or ASICs are expending their effort creating hashcash proofs-of-work which act as a vote in the blockchain evolution and validate the blockchain transaction log.

Hashcash is a proof-of-work system used to limit email spam and denial-of-service attacks, and more recently has become known for its use in bitcoin (and other cryptocurrencies) as part of the mining algorithm.

In contrast to hashcash in mail applications that relies on recipients to set manually an amount of work intended to deter malicious senders, the Bitcoin cryptocurrency network employs a different hashing-based Proof-of-work challenge to enable competitive bitcoin mining. A bitcoin miner runs a computer program that collects unconfirmed transactions from coin dealers in the network. 

With other data these can form a block and earn a payment to the miner, but a block is accepted by the network only when the miner discovers by trial and error a "nonce" number that when included in the block yields a hash with a sufficient number of leading zero bits to meet the network's difficulty target. 

Blocks accepted from miners form the bitcoin Blockchain that is a growing ledger of every bitcoin transaction since the coin's first creation.


While hashcash uses the SHA-1 hash and requires the first 20 of 160 hash bits to be zero, bitcoin's proof of work uses two successive SHA-256 hashes and originally required at least the first 32 of 256 hash bits to be zero. However the bitcoin network periodically resets the difficulty level to keep the average rate of block creation at 6 per hour. 

As of August 2017 (block #478608) the bitcoin network has responded to deployments of ever faster hashing hardware by miners by hardening the requirement to first 72 of 256 hash bits must be zero.



RECAPITULATION:

Proof of work is a requirement to define an expensive computer calculation, also called mining, that needs to be performed in order to create a new group of trustless transactions (the so-called block) on a distributed ledger called blockchain.

Mining serves as two purposes:---

To verify the legitimacy of a transaction, or avoiding the so-called double-spending;

To create new digital currencies by rewarding miners for performing the previous task.

When you want to set a transaction this is what happens behind the scenes:

Transactions are bundled together into what we call a block;

Miners verify that transactions within each block are legitimate;

To do so, miners should solve a mathematical puzzle known as proof-of-work problem;

A reward is given to the first miner who solves each blocks problem;

Verified transactions are stored in the public blockchain

This “mathematical puzzle” has a key feature: asymmetry. The work, in fact, must be moderately hard on the requester side but easy to check for the network.

All the network miners compete to be the first to find a solution for the mathematical problem that concerns the candidate block, a problem that cannot be solved in other ways than through brute force so that essentially requires a huge number of attempts.

When a miner finally finds the right solution, he announces it to the whole network at the same time, receiving a cryptocurrency prize (the reward) provided by the protocol.

From a technical point of view, mining process is an operation of inverse hashing: it determines a number (nonce), so the cryptographic hash algorithm of block data results in less than a given threshold.

This threshold, called difficulty, is what determines the competitive nature of mining: more computing power is added to the network, the higher this parameter increases, increasing also the average number of calculations needed to create a new block.

This method also increases the cost of the block creation, pushing miners to improve the efficiency of their mining systems to maintain a positive economic balance. This parameter update should occur approximately every 14 days, and a new block is generated every 10 minutes.

Proof of work is not only used by the bitcoin blockchain but also by ethereum and many other blockchains.

Proof of stake is a different way to validate transactions based and achieve the distributed consensus.

It is still an algorithm, and the purpose is the same of the proof of work, but the process to reach the goal is quite different.

Unlike the proof-of-Work, where the algorithm rewards miners who solve mathematical problems with the goal of validating transactions and creating new blocks, with the proof of stake, the creator of a new block is chosen in a deterministic way, depending on its wealth, also defined as stake.

No block reward

Also, all the digital currencies are previously created in the beginning, and their number never changes.

This means that in the PoS system there is no block reward, so, the miners take the transaction fees.

This is why, in fact, in this PoS system miners are called forgers, instead.
Ethereum community wants to exploit the proof of stake method for a more greener and cheaper distributed form of consensus.

Also, rewards for the creation of a new block are different: with Proof-of-Work, the miner may potentially own none of the digital currency he is mining.

In Proof-of-Stake, forgers are always those who own the coins minted.

If Casper (the new proof of stake consensus protocol) will be implemented, there will exist a validator pool. Users can join this pool to be selected as the forger. This process will be available through a function of calling the Casper contract and sending Ether – or the coin who powers the Ethereum network – together with it.

Using a Proof-of-Work system, bad actors are cut out thanks to technological and economic disincentives.

In fact, programming an attack to a PoW network is very expensive, and you would need more money than you can be able to steal.

Instead, the underlying PoS algorithm must be as bulletproof as possible because, without especially penalties, a proof of stake-based network could be cheaper to attack.

To solve this issue, Buterin created the Casper protocol, designing an algorithm that can use the set some circumstances under which a bad validator might lose their deposit.

He explained: “Economic finality is accomplished in Casper by requiring validators to submit deposits to participate, and taking away their deposits if the protocol determines that they acted in some way that violates some set of rules (‘slashing conditions’).”

Slashing conditions refer to the circumstances above or laws that a user is not supposed to break.

Thanks to a PoS system validators do not have to use their computing power because the only factors that influence their chances are the total number of their own coins and current complexity of the network.

So this possible future switch from PoW to PoS may provide the following benefits:---

Energy savings;

A safer network as attacks become more expensive: if a hacker would like to buy 51% of the total number of coins, the market reacts by fast price appreciation.

This way, CASPER will be a security deposit protocol that relies on an economic consensus system. Nodes (or the validators) must pay a security deposit in order to be part of the consensus thanks to the new blocks creation. Casper protocol will determine the specific amount of rewards received by the validators thanks to its control over security deposits.

If one validator creates an “invalid” block, his security deposit will be deleted, as well as his privilege to be part of the network consensus.

In other words, the Casper security system is based on something like bets. In a PoS-based system, bets are the transactions that, according to the consensus rules, will reward their validator with a money prize together with each chain that the validator has bet on.


So, Casper is based on the idea that validators will bet according to the others’ bets and leave positive feedbacks that are able accelerates consensus.


Hyperledger Sawtooth, developed by Intel offers a modular blockchain architecture. It consists of Proof of Elapsed Time (PoET), a consensus algorithm developed by Intel for high efficiency among distributed ledgers.

Sawtooth employs an EXPERIMENTAL  consensus algorithm -- Proof of Elapsed Time, or PoET. 

It’s a form of random leader election, wherein each validator node waits a random amount of time before trying to claim a block.

In other random leader election algorithms like Proof of Work, that randomness is enforced by searching for partial hash collisions. PoET replaces that work with trusted computing. The benefit of this is a more economical and greener algorithm (as compared to ASIC mining rigs). 

Rather than chips churning on hash functions, the trusted computing functions allow each node to get on with other work until its timer expires, putting computing cycles into useful operations without wasted electricity. 

PoET is a return to the Satoshi intent of “one-CPU-one-vote”. In its original form PoET exists near the unpermissioned end of the policy spectrum. 

Any host that can provide certain cryptographic proofs about the correctness of its execution can publish a block. The sawtooth-core maintainers have begun adding scaffolding to support the more direct authorization models that consortia may require. 

The first policies in this new framework include basic requirements of a validator such that it is running the correct version of the consensus algorithm and that it has a verifiably unique identity on the network (an anti-sybil feature of PoET). 

The network itself validates authorization of each node as it joins the system. Once validated, those nodes and their authorization data are committed to a table on the ledger, called the Validator Registry. 

Building on these new features, participants in a network can define arbitrarily elaborate (or simple) authorization policies. This authorization framework then lets the underlying PoET consensus algorithm be utilized across a wide swath of the public to private ledger spectrum.

While Ethereum is a public Blockchain, Hyperledger is a private blockchain. This means enterprises within the network know who is present on the peer nodes, unlike Ethereum.

Hyperledger is a permissioned network i.e., it has the ability to grant permission on who can participate in the consensus mechanism of the Blockchain network. Ethereum, on the other hand, is permissionless.

Hyperledger has no built-in cryptocurrency. Ethereum, on the other hand, has a built-in cryptocurrency, called Ether. Many applications don’t need a cryptocurrency to function, and using Ethereum there can be a disadvantage.

Hyperledger gives you the flexibility of choosing a programming language such as Java or Go, for preparing smart contracts. Ethereum, on the other hand, uses Solidity which is a lot less common in use.


Hyperledger is highly scalable — unlike traditional Blockchain and Ethereum — with minimal performance losses.


BITCOIN JUMPS FROM 738 USD TO 8315 USD IN ONE YEAR FLAT 


ALL THOSE WHO SAYS , THIS IS NOT A BUBBLE


RAISE YOUR HANDS


GOOD !



At its core, blockchain is a public ledger technology that uses cryptography to provide an authoritative record of secure transactions. The technology is deemed disruptive in that it eliminates centralization, which uses a trusted third party. 

A trusted third party is a middle man facilitating a transaction between two parties. This centralized architecture underlies the brunt of transactions today.

Trusted third parties like banks and payment providers, dominate the financial services industry.

Blockchain threatens to disrupt this model.

BUT HEY ----ARUN JAITLEY AND SBI CHAIRMAN WANTS TO TRUST INTEL 100% WITH A NEW BLOCKCHAIN SYSTEM , FOR WHICH INDIANS WILL BE USED AS GUINEA PIGS-  

THEY MERGED ALL INDIAN BANKS FOR THIS FINAL BRUTUS TYPE THRUST 

THIS HAS BEEN THE STORY OF OUR LIFE IN INDIA EVER SINCE ROTHSCHILD TOOK OVER INDIA  , RIGHT?

Blockchain  technology leverages mathematics (digital signatures, cryptographic hashing, and consensus mechanisms) to enable untrusted parties to transact directly in a secure manner, without having to deal with a middle man. 

This type of transaction is known as trustless trust, and it is paving the way for a radical transformation of established industries, notably in the financial services sector. In addition, blockchain technology could impact emerging markets, such as those forming around the Internet of Things (IoT).

The origin story of blockchain is in Bitcoin, and the associated terminology is best understood from this source. Blockchain is, therefore, a type of distributed ledger technology, but not all distributed ledgers are effectively blockchains. 

The purpose of a consensus algorithm in a public Blockchain network is to make sure that the network’s participants agree on the current state of the Blockchain without the need to trust each other or to have a central authority.

It all started with Proof of Work

The use of Proof of Work mining was initially proposed to establish that a given block had required a certain amount of work to be mined. This allowed users to simply pick the longest valid chain with the highest amount of work as the correct chain.

However, Proof of Work is extremely inefficient in terms of energy consumption. 

This makes it expensive and incentivizes miners to centralize the hashing power. 

So, instead of pushing us towards a truly distributed network, these concentrated mining farms have become de facto authorities.

Another alternative was needed.

The focus switched to Proof of Stake

A Proof of Stake algorithm has nothing to do with mining. Instead, it is about validating. The specific actor responsible for the next block in the chain is determined by the Proof of Stake algorithm. 

In order to avoid overly concentrating this power, the algorithm must have some kind of randomness. At the least, voting shares must be distributed properly to avoid morphing into a centralized system.

Without going into details about its advantages over Proof of Work, Proof of Stake eliminates the need to spend a huge amount of electric power to validate the blocks. 

Instead, blockchain participants with the most stake in it are selected by algorithm for the right to validate the blocks. The assumption behind Proof of Stake is the following: those who hold a stake in a network are incentivized to act in its interests. All else equal, the more stake one has, the higher should be his or her interest in preserving the system.

In a Proof of Stake system, each validator must own some stake in the network. These stakes are bonded, which means that network participants deposit some money into the network using it as a collateral to vouch for a block.

In a Proof of Work network, everyone accepts the chain as valid because a significant amount of effort has been employed. Meanwhile, in a Proof of Stake network participants trust the chain with the highest collateral.

Within the cryptocurrency world Proof of Work remains the most widely adopted consensus algorithm. However, a few prominent projects including NXT, BitShares and Ethereum use or are migrating to Proof of Stake.

Even within the Bitcoin community, some members are considering trying to change the digital currency’s Proof of Work consensus mechanism to address scaling issues and improve the network’s operation.

While Proof of Stake might have certain advantages, it is not a panacea. The problem is that there is no guarantee that the validator with the highest collateral deposited for a block is going to operate the network in its best interests.

Proof of Stake coins are plagued with issues because rational people tend to act in their own self-interest. PoS works only because the best interests of the largest stakeholders usually do align with those of the network. In the case of a disagreement, however, the largest stakeholder might assume the role of the supreme commander

The distributed Proof of Stake algorithm was created to solve problems with the earlier Proof of Work algorithms. To make it work the decisions are weighted based on multiple factors.

First and foremost, the size of the stake and the interests of a validator are taken into account. Secondly, it is important to check when their decision last became the primary decision agreed upon by the network’s participants. Finally, it needs to be considered whether the outcome of this decision met with approval by the majority of the network participants.

The Ethereum platform has a difference with the Bitcoin blockchain .   It includes a Turing-complete programming framework that enables users to create contracts that are more complex than the simple transactions allowed by Bitcoin. 

Ethereum is essentially a public blockchain-based distributed computing platform that includes a programming language (Solidity), a runtime environment (Ethereum Virtual Machine), a cryptocurrency (Ether), and APIs, among other features. The general idea is that smart contracts effectively represent contractual agreements between two or more parties. 

For example, they can release funds, communicate information, record and embed data, or even make purchases; all this in a pre-programmed, self-executing, autonomous manner. Digital identities can be created for physical property and intangible assets, whose ownership and functioning can be controlled through smart contracts on the blockchain.

Moving even beyond smart contracts is the idea of software-based DAOs. They can also be created for societies and corporations. At the core, they are AI-based autonomous agents. They can be a party to a smart contract, and are best defined as a set or class of long-lasting

smart contracts. DAOs can be used to implement more complex governance structures, such as owning, exchanging, and trading resources, interacting with other parties (human and machine), and executing pre-defined tasks.

A decentralized autonomous organization (DAO), is an organization that is run through rules encoded as computer programs called smart contracts.   A DAO's financial transaction record and program rules are maintained on a blockchain. 

The best-known example was The DAO, a DAO for venture capital funding, which was launched with $150 million in crowdfunding in June 2016, implementing its smart contracts through Ethereum, and was immediately hacked and drained of US$50 million in cryptocurrency.  

This hack ( an INSIDE JOB  ) was reversed in the following weeks, and the money restored, via a hard fork of the Ethereum blockchain. This decentralized bailout was made possible by a majority vote of the blockchain's hash rate.

The DAO hack on the Ethereum blockchain in June 2016 forced stakeholders and core developers to overturn parts of the blockchain and backtrack to a previous state. 

This bitterly divided the Ethereum community and revealed that the blockchain is not truly immutable. Without going into detail about the hack, it revealed essentially that code is unable to discern intent and will function regardless, allowing both good faith and malice to guide it. 

Smart contracts are, therefore, not likely to take the form  of complex legal contracts anytime soon until issues surrounding liabilities and dispute resolution can be more effectively addressed.

However, the problem of legal applicability could eventually be resolved. Recognition and support by government and law enforcement on blockchain could provide a clearer legal status. As for The DAO hack, the issue was resolved without recourse to the judicial system, which leaves many legal questions unanswered. 

Further, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently weighed in on The DAO hack, stating that the tokens traded in the Initial Coin Offering were effectively securities. While the SEC did not leverage any penalties, the published decision aims to direct future ICOs in the space and possible compliance requirements with U.S. securities laws 

Smart contracts and DAOs can be used for numerous applications: digital identities, voting, governance,  smart property, asset tracking, engineering-related transactions, smart diagnostics and machine maintenance, supply chain tracking, M2M transactions, tracking supplier identity and reputation, registry of assets and inventory, etc. 

Through these evolving technologies, blockchain will affect and perhaps radically transform all kinds of interactions, including business, legal, social, and political.

Although major blockchain activity exists in the financial technology market, there is little commercial activity in other verticals. The reason for this is the embryonic state of the new concept, as well as lack of understanding in these end markets, which are currently in a state of digital transformation. 

private centralized permissioned ledgers may jeopardize the concept of immutability. Blockchains are already potentially susceptible to colluding attacks whereby one or more nodes exceeding 51% of mining power could cheat the network into accepting unlawful transactions or other nefarious action. 

For example, the colluding forces could engage in a “hard fork” of the network and move together to an amended blockchain. The challenge is that such an attack would require a large number of colluding parties

Private and permissioned blockchains, and new applications on public blockchains, are vulnerable to this type of manipulation. 

Beyond the core issue of immutability, blockchain technology still has to overcome other barriers, notably with regard to regulatory compliance, scaling, processing and redundancy costs, and, finally, privacy and security.

Currently, cryptocurrencies, DAOs, and smart contracts exist in an extra-judicial bubble governed solely by code without input or oversight by a central authority, such as a financial authority, trade commission, law enforcement entity, or other government authority.

There are open-ended questions on dispute resolution, liability, and redress. Within highly regulated sectors, blockchain might not be a suitable solution if it is not in compliance, and existing regulation is often designed with a central authority to govern and identifiable parties that can be made liable in case of breach or error. 

It will take time to adapt existing regulation to blockchain technologies for usecases in more complex settings as they relate to the IoT, the legal profession, or even in financial services beyond digital payments. 

Scaling is another critical obstacle to overcome. The distributed feature requires all nodes to record all transactions within a common shared ledger. The Bitcoin ledger is currently over 100 GB in size, served by 6,900 full nodes-- forecasts 27 billion connected IoT devices by the end of 2017.

Scaling blockchain technology to that kind of size is going to be difficult and costly. Even within the Bitcoin blockchain, there is a move toward using centralized intermediaries to clear payments. In fact, Bitcoin recently underwent a hard fork, with a new cryptocurrency emerging, Bitcoin Cash, after years-long debate. The reason behind it was to scale Bitcoin to more users with Bitcoin Cash blocks effectively increased to 8MB (as opposed to the 1MB of Bitcoin). 

Add to that the operational costs (in terms of processing power and energy consumption) to mining and verifying transactions on the blockchain, and it becomes clear that scale and decentralization are at odds with each other and a trade-off will need to be found, notably in light of IoT blockchain applications 

There are major issues revolving around privacy and security. While the Bitcoin blockchain does not record accountbalances (only transactions), it is possible to extract information about users based on the transactions (through public keys). This may be a barrier for those applications that require a higher level of privacy protection and confidentiality 

As for security, The DAO hack shows that the blockchain is vulnerable. There have been other DAO hacks since, most recently in July 2017, when USD$7 million was drained from CoinDash’s ICO, again an INSIDE JOB . 

Whether through bugs in code, or by finding a loophole in smart contracts, there will always be interest by malicious parties to exploit it, and this interest will grow alongside blockchain’s popularity.

Blockchain security relies on verification of transactions and proof of work. Should the incentive for mining the blockchain be centralized within the entity funding the miners (as will likely be the case in permissioned and private blockchains), then the risk of a single point of failure is high. Security needs to be stronger for a more open and decentralized blockchain system.


There are currently competing concepts: public and private; permissioned versus permission-less. Various endeavors are employing different algorithms and methodologies to address issues in energy consumption and security, i.e., proof of work (Bitcoin), proof of stake (Peercoin), delegated proof of stake (BitShares), practical byzantine fault tolerance (Hyperledger), etc. 

Ethereum is planning to switch from proof of work to proof of stake before the end of 2017, citing energy consumption concerns primarily. In time, successful adoption and widespread usage will inform standards work in the future, and determine which technology will ultimately provide the most cost-effective, secure, and efficient solution.

Ultimately, blockchain technologies have a long way to go before commercial applications beyond cryptocurrencies can be successfully implemented.

WE ASK ARUN JAITLEY AND  MODI NOT TO HOCK BHARATMATA IN KOSHER INTELs  MANDI.   

WE THE PEOPLE WONT ALLOW IT ..EVEN IF YOU BUY RETIREMENT HOMES IN ISRAEL

Blockchain must undergo its fair share of trials and errors and we must don’t dive off the deep end , throwing caution into the winds –just because Modi has been hugged by a white Jew and called LANGOT YAAR.
.
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/banking/finance/banking/sbi-to-use-blockchain-for-smart-contracts-and-kyc-by-next-month/articleshow/61715860.cms

OODHAR -- SABOOR -- AAARYAAAA

READ THE POST BELOW FIRST

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2017/11/blockchain-proof-of-elapsed-time-intel.html

WE MUST NOT DIVE OFF THE DEEP END AND ADOPT BLOCKCHAIN -ULU (OR IS IT UDU? )
WHY DO OUR THINK TANKS HAVE SHIT FOR BRAINS?

HOW DID ENRON HACK AND BLEED BHARATMATA ? ARE WE "ALICE IN WONDERLAND " ?

PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN THE WEBSITES OF

PMO,

PM MODI

SBI CHAIRMAN

ARUN JAITLEY

FINANCE MINISTRY

EDUCATION MINISTER

SMRITI IRANI ( SHE WILL SURELY SAY -- YEH APNA ARTICLE MEIN NAHIN LIKHELA HAI )

LAW MINISTER

CJI

SUPREME COURT BAR COUNCIL

HOME MINISTER

YOGI ADITYANATH

CMs OF BOTH TELUGU LANDS

DEFENCE MINISTER

SUSHMA SWARAJ

NITI AYOG

SWAMY

GURUMURTHY

FAYE SORPOTEL DSOU#A ( TELL HER IT IS EASIER THAN POTHOLES )

ARNAB GOSWAMI ( TELL HIM IT IS EASIER THAN VVIP RACISM )

AND WEBSITES OF SENSIBLE DESH BHAKT LEADERS

capt ajit vadakayil
..









































JUDGES CANNOT CREATE LAWS—THEY CAN ONLY INTERPRET LAWS, MADE BY THE ELECTED LEGISTLATURE.

COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY WHERE JUDGES ELECT JUDGES IS NOT ALLOWED BY OUR CONSTITUTION.

CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL WHO REPRESENTS “WE THE PEOPLE” DECLARES -“ EVERY LAW CREATED BY MELORD COLLEGIUM JUDGES ARE NULL AND VOID , UNLESS SECONDED AND REGULARISED BY THE ELECTED LEGISTLATURE “

CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL WHO REPRESENTS “WE THE PEOPLE” DECLARES -- “ EVERY PAST JUDGEMENT OF COLLEGIUM JUDGES IS NULL AND VOID –REASON—BECAUSE ALMOST ALL THESE CASES TOOK TOO LONG TO SETTLE . ALL THESE CASES WERE JUDGES ON ROTHSCHILDs “JUSTICE IS BLIND” SYSTEM. MOST DIRECT WITNESSES WERE PRODUCED OUT OF THIN AIR.. IF THESE PAST JUDGEMENTS ARE LOOKED ON AS A BEACON IT WILL NOT SERVE JUSTICE –AS THEY WILL BE OUTSIDE THE PERIMETER OF CONTEXT AND WILL NOT FOLLOW THE PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE ( DHARMA).

THE CONSTITUTION HAS THREE FORCES ABOVE IT-
1- WE THE PEOPLE
2- WATAN
3- NATURAL JUSTICE ( DHARMA )
WE DEMAND A STOP TO PIL FILED BY FOREIGN FUNDED NGOs AND FOREIGN CONTROLLED DESH DROHI INDIVIDUALS WITH ULTERIOR MOTIVES AND AGENDA

Prashant Bhushan , a co-founder of AAP, a self-righteous publicity-seeker and an anarchist has filed more than 500 PIL cases in Supreme court

The Centre for Public Interest Litigation was founded by senior advocates including Fali Sam Nariman, Shanti Bhushan ( father of Prashant Bhushan ) , Colin Gonsalves etc who has never supported Bharatmata and the watan

A Supreme Court bench of Chief Justice TS Thakur and Justices AK Sikri and R Banumathi has questioned credentials and authenticity of public interest litigations (PIL) Bhushan has been filing at regular intervals.

The Supreme court bench castigated Prashant Bhushan in Jan 2016 “Prashant Bhushan, you have an image of a crusader. But can you become the centre for public interest litigation? Can the system be taken for a ride in such a manner? We cannot allow this. We must be satisfied that you have a committee which scrutinizes the complaints and allows only genuine ones to be converted into public interest litigations”

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2017/10/time-has-come-to-save-watan-time-is-now.html


Read all 7 parts of the post below--
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2016/03/foreign-funded-trojan-horse-ngos-pil.html

WE WILL NOT ALLOW ANY PIL ON FINANCIAL MATTERS . EVEN RAJYA SABHA CANNOT HAVE A HANDLE OF FINANCIAL METTERS .
JUDGES CAN RULE ONLY ON INDIVIDUAL MATTERS AND NOT ISSUES DEALING WITH THE WHOLE NATION ( ON THE BASIS OF A VESTED PIL )

PIL WAS STARTED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD IN USA IN 1876 – WHEN A PIL OFFICE ( TO PROTECT JEWS ) WAS STARTED IN NEW YORK.



WISDOM— DISPENSING JUSTICE FOR AGGRIEVED PEOPLE VIA A LEGAL FORUM , VIA ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION HAS NOTHING TO DO –REPEAT—NOTHING TO DO -- WITH UNELECTED JUDGES ( COLLEGIUM MELORDS WHO ELECT THEMSELVES ) CREATING LAWS FOR THE WHOLE NATION---- TO BE SHOVED DOWN THE COLLECTIVE THROATS OF A NON-AGGRIEVED POPULATION .    THE CONSTITUTION DOES NOT ALLOW THIS.    WE THE PEOPLE WILL NOT ALLOW THIS. 

READ ABOVE PARA A MILLION TIMES.


PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN THE WEBSITES OF PMO, PM MODI, LAW MINISTER, CJI, SUPREME COURT BAR COUNCIL , HOME MINISTER, FINANCE MINISTER, SUSHMA SWARAJ, EDUCATION MINISTER, I&B MINISTER, YOGI ADITYANATH, SWAMY, GURUMURTHY , AND WEBSITES OF DESH BHAKT LEADERS

Capt ajit vadakayil
..






  1. FROM PHOTOS I RECKON R BHANUMATHI WAS MY CLASS MATE AT KENDIYA VIDYALAYA CALICUT IN 6TH , 7TH AND 8TH STANDARDS.

    SHE WAS B OF MBBS ( MALLIKA/ BHANUMATHI/ BHOOMA/ SHAKEELA ) .

    BHANUMATI WAS QUIET AND LEVEL HEADED— JUDGE MATERIAL .

    EVERY TIME THE CLASS EXAM MARKS CAME, FOR DIFFERENT SUBJECTS , BHANUMATHI USED TO TURN BACK AND ASK ME MY MARKS – AS I WAS FIRST IN CLASS—AND SHE WOULD DO TABULASSANN . SO I AM SURE SHE WILL REMEMBER ME.

    I WAS A OF ANUS ( AJIT / NANDAKUMAR/ ULLAS/ SATISH ) –THE BENCH SITTING RIGHT BEHIND THEM.


WE HAVE A TWO FINGERED BLOGGER WRITING ABOUT BLOCKCHAIN AND SHELL COMPANIES

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2017/11/blockchain-bitcoins-ponzi-part-13-capt.html

PRANNOY JAMES ROY WITH AN IRISH MOTHER CONVERTED HIMSELF INTO AN INTELLECTUAL BY TALKING MINDLESS SHIT ABOUT ELECTION RESULTS

WHAT DOES THE CHOOT MAIN STREAM MEDIA DO?

THEY ARE ENGAGED IN VVIP RACISm, HINDU FRINGE ELEMENTS, POT HOLES, BOLLYWOOD, CRICKET , HINDI HEARTLAND POLITICS

I ASK THE MODI GOVT

CHANGE THE RULESs

JOURNALISTS MUST COMPULSORILY DO MATH -- SO THAT THEY CAN THINK FOR PEANUTS

PUT THIS COMMENT IN THE WEBSITES OF SMRITI IRANI, PM MODI, PMO, FINANCE MINISTER , LAW MINISTER, CJI, SWAMY, GURU MURTHY, EDUCATION MINISTER

capt ajit vadakayil
..
SOMEBODY ASKED ME

WHY MATH FOR JOURNALISTS?

WELL CAN YOU EVER MAKE THAT PEA BRAINED FAYE SORPOTEL DSOUA UNDERSTAND

THAT IN A NATION LIKE INDIA WITH 1300 MILLION PEOPLE

HAVING ONE RAPE EVERY HOUR MEANS NOTHING ?

A EUROPEAN NATION HAVING 13 MILLION PEOPLE-- ONE RAPE PER DAY MEANS SOMETHING

capt ajit vadakayil
..



WHEN BASTARD ISLAMIC PAINTER MF HUSSAIN SHOWED SITA HAPPILY PREENING HER HAIR SITTING NAKED ON RAVANAs LAP AFTER ILLICIT SEX,    THE COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY CRIED    “ VERY GOOD.   GREAT ARTISTIC FREEDOM”
WE KNOW THESE BASTARD DROHI JUDGES  ..  THEY HAVE RETIRED...
HINDUS HAVE WOKEN UP
RAJPUTS WILL DEFEND THEIR HONOUR
JUST WHO THE HELL IS THE FELLOW SANJAY LEELA BHANSALI—   A MAN WITHOUT WIFE AND CHILDREN AT THE AGE OF 55  ? . 
HIS SERVANTS HAVE BLOWN THE WHISTLE.     WE KNOW WHO HE IS.   
WE KNOW THE SEXUAL PREFERENCES OF MF HUSSAIN TOO.


Below:  DROHI woman ( who looks like a man in a sari ) immediately called MF Hussain an ANGEL --  this KALANK celebrates when Bharatmata bleeds and is one of the most hated women in India.




CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL DECLARES

EVERY LAW CREATED BY COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY IS NULL AND VOID AS PER OUR CONSTITUTION

WHAT IS THE WAY OUT ?

COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY MUST CREATE A TRANSPARENT WEBSITE

PUT DOWN ALL LAWS THE JUDGES HAVE CREATED 

WITH A REQUEST ( NOT AN ORDER ) TO THE ELECTED LEGISLATURE TO SECOND IT AND CONVERT IT TO LAW
WE THE PEOPLE , THE WATAN AND DHARMA (NATURAL JUSTICE ) ARE ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION

THIS BLOGSITE REPRESENTS "WE THE PEOPLE"

FOREIGN FUNDED DESH DROHI NGOs ARE THE DRIVING FORCE BEHIND ALMOST ALL PILs--VESTED WITH ULTERIOR MOTIVE

WE THE PEOPLE ALSO DECLARE-- BURN ALL PAST MELORD JUDGEMENTS --MADE BY "JUSTICE IS BLIND" ROTHSCHILD SYSTEM 

JUSTICE MUST NEVER BE BLIND --IT MUST BE WITHIN THE PERIMETER OF CONTEXT AND MUST NOT KICK NATURAL JUSTICE ON ITS TEETH

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2017/10/time-has-come-to-save-watan-time-is-now.html

PUT THIS COMMENT IN THE WEBSITES OF

CJI

SUPREME COURT BAR COUNCIL

LAW MINISTER

ATTORNEY GENERAL

PM

PM MODI

HOME MINISTER

I&B MINISTER

EDUCATION MINISTER

AND ALL DESH BHAKT LEADERS.. SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA

capt ajit vadakayil
..





CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
..